‘Complete double standard’: Tobacco giant lobbied against regulations in Africa which are law in UK
British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.
Campaign in Zambia
Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders asks for measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.
The company is attempting amendments to a draft bill that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.
Health advocate reaction
“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.
Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.
The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among public interest organizations.
Worldwide lobbying patterns
This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with health policies. In recent weeks, international health experts raised concerns that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.
“Evidence exists of industry lobbying worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” stated the corporate monitoring director.
Potential consequences
“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”
The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.
Business countermeasures
Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be reduced to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, delayed for at least twelve months after the law is enacted.
The WHO specifically advises a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.
Flavor restrictions debate
The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.
The pending regulation suggests penalties for multiple violations “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.
Business explanation
Through correspondence, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary states the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but asserts that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”
Campaigner rebuttal
The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.
The reality that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he said.
“We exist in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself complete moral failure.”
Public health laws in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”
Standard business position
A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “The company operates its activities following with current country statutes. Further, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which provide for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”
The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that underage people should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.
“We advocate for developing rules to accomplish desired population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, adding that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which encompasses rising levels of illicit trade”.
Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.